Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Radeon RX 480 GPU Core Current
#1
I'm running hwi_589_3520 on Windows 7 64-Bit. Radeon RX 480 GPU.

I ran a Unigene Valley Benchmark a little while ago and when I was going over my temperatures and power draw I saw something that didn't look right to me, but I'm far from an expert on electrical stuff.

I have a screen shot showing max GPU Core Current at 119.094 A.  If I'm understanding that correctly there was a peak draw of 119 Amps?  I'm hoping a sensor threw out a garbage number somewhere because that doesn't look right to me.

https://pasteboard.co/HGCwDHM.jpg

And yes, I'm running an older system with a Core i5-2500k so the PCIe v2 limitation is correct.

Thanks for your help.
Reply
#2
Hi Swarlos,

run the Benchmark again with Logging switched on, but "Polling Period" should be at least 1000ms (otherwise needed ressources for logging are too high, especially during a benchmark):

   

In the logs it's much easier to check if such a high value was a "spike" (invalid) measurement or not ... e.g. I saw spike values of temperatures underneath "absolute zero point" Big Grin
Reply
#3
(10-02-2018, 07:22 PM)TomWoB Wrote: Hi Swarlos,

run the Benchmark again with Logging switched on, but "Polling Period" should be at least 1000ms (otherwise needed ressources for logging are too high, especially during a benchmark):



In the logs it's much easier to check if such a high value was a "spike" (invalid) measurement or not ... e.g. I saw spike values of temperatures underneath "absolute zero point" Big Grin

I just opened up the settings to increase the polling period and it's already at 2000ms.

I'll try running it again to see if I can duplicate the problem.

Update:

Ran it again, got similar high max amperage readings.

https://pasteboard.co/HGD2Fpc.jpg
Reply
#4
2000ms is fine ... can you upload a logifle of the benchmark?
Reply
#5
I haven't used the logging feature yet, but I think this is it.

http://www.filedropper.com/benchmarklog
Reply
#6
Hi Swarlos, yes this is it!

   

If you have a look at the "GPU Core Power" (up to 150W) you can see that the 120 ampere make sense by a voltage of 1.1-1.2V, because
Power = Voltage * Current

But these 120 ampere are "internal the graphic card", not from power supply to graphic card (which is powered by 12V). Hmmm ... your 12V drop down is a little bit high 12.20 -> 11.83 V ... thin cables ?
Reply
#7
(10-02-2018, 09:02 PM)TomWoB Wrote: Hi Swarlos, yes this is it!



If you have a look at the "GPU Core Power" (up to 150W) you can see that the 120 ampere make sense by a voltage of 1.1-1.2V, because
Power = Voltage * Current

But these 120 ampere are "internal the graphic card", not from power supply to graphic card (which is powered by 12V). Hmmm ... your 12V drop down is a little bit high 12.20 -> 11.83 V ... thin cables ?

By the 12V you mean the 8-pin PCI Express cable from the PSU?  I'm using the cable that came with PSU when I bought it a little over 6 years ago.  OCZ600MXSP
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a...6817341017

Thanks for your help, I thought the 120 amps were going through 12V, not 1.1-1.2V. That makes me feel a lot better.
Reply
#8
119 Amps is well possible on those GPUs, so I believe it's an accurate value. >100 Amps on higher performance GPUs is no problem.
Reply
#9
I think the 12V are measured on the motherboard, so it's more the 24-pin cable to the motherboard. But ... I think it's not a "cable issue", it's more that your power supply voltages goes "a little bit too much down under pressure". Btw ... your needed power "is not so high", 150W for a graphic card is "mid-range", my GTX 1080 Ti takes 280W and more, but my Seasonic power supply goes only down from 12.19 - 12.10V.

Anyway ... if your system is running stable ... everything seems to be fine Big Grin
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)