Search results

How do i fix this ????.CB RUN (ENDING) STOCK auto.NO PBO. (Vs 47c same fullCBoad but with an all core 4.2 ghz @1.131v / 41c with no multitrd)

i dint mean to "miss quote you", personally i just dont see the real benefit ,BECOUSE THERE IS NONE ? . forget about , motherboard regulators, boosting algorithms. the later is all marketing bs to me, my killawatt meter DOES NOT LIE ? PERIDOd. DISABLING BOOST? / PBO > lower power...

sorry " The FIT controller regulates frequency and voltage within a few msecs in very short but rapid bursts to keep performance high and silicon stress low, that no static frequency or voltage can match." this is 100% BS. "playing" with pbo settings, prime B450M-A / r5 -3600 / eventually...

you can't handle the truth!

thanks! downloaded

it seems ASUS = extra juice. mine does the same exp with auto bias / PBO ( a bit less)

Back to the orig subject, tested the default stock config power deviation (with no PBO, NO BIAS, regular load line) this are the results. Fired cinebench 1rst (loading)then hwinfo, stock 91.3% deviation. Bottom fixed 4.2 ghz 1.1v core (bios) no pbo, boost, bias. 100.3% power deviation.

cB LOAD with ryzen master ( monitoring) auto vs 4.2 oc (bios) . same result. Auto has only better edc (but did a shorter test) all other metric are worst vs fixed clocks @ 1.1v ( FIRSTpic) also idle cpu goes low power even with a fixed oc w balanced plan. And to SLEEP w low power. Why bother...

its seems my mobo has OLD VOLTAGE FREQ CURVES but the cpu is from the newer XT quality chip batch that use less power. so far setting a fixed 42 multiplier , + 0.05 vcore yealds better temps / clock / power consumption . edit. using this with no boost of any kind ATM. asus blows...

Edit.. wrong again. Stellar perf (heat and comsuntion) with fixed oc. Crap with any kind of boost

Post removed..managed to control temps

big ass aircooler. but notice the 10C increase from auto stock vs fixed oc, its more running prime / blend small ftts 72c

What worries me, is the shit temps i get , even with insane cooling on auto. never had this problem with intel... edit. any imput from pics provided??? max confusion. i prefer to run things stock but its seems this is an alien concept for amd / asus

Edit. ASUS PRIME B450M-A . Using auto bias and auto load line? More heat and power cons from wall. Using regular load line? Worst. No bias and auto line somehow finaly worked. In have lower temps than ocn with low vcore!!!! Cinebench goes from 3845 to 3282, but i dont care...

confused. will read more and test. i have the lowest power consumption ( measured from wall with meter) with a fixed all core oc (4.2 ghz) + 0.05 vcore offest in bios (1.1v) pbo, and all other boost DISABLED, rest all auto, using the AUTO settings? increased TEMPS at load +...

maybe im dumb but I DONT GET IT ... With 150A setting (50% of the actual), YOU HAVE THE BEST FREQUENCY 4106.6MHz, THE LOWEST POWER CONSUMPTION 91.553W AND LOWEST and peak CPU temperature of 79°C. T ???? so all wins no negatives or im i missing something here ( yes there is the ethical...