VictorVG
Well-Known Member
For quite a long time (probably since the beginning of the year) was observed strange phenomena in my opinion - periodically obyno network activity after the OS or applications increases dramatically the use of CPU core and this effect is accompanied by a similar to HWiNFO32 / HWiNFO64, but only on the same machine. At first I thought that it is caused by the consequences of errors of drivers NIC, but after replacing the HDD you install the OS from the installation DVD phenomenon is preserved while it is accompanied by a second phenomenon - after their restart HWiNFO32 / HWiNFO64 stops reading SPD and the information displayed on the screen System Summary in RAM block, we see an empty space such as the machine is not installed memory modules, and this phenomenon can (on this machine is not always) accompanied by a failure X-s leading to their restart. I personally assume that there is any conflict of RAM modules, or simply banal refusal chipset, although such an instrument malfunction, and is not, and even at a time oscilloscope and waveform analyzer show that the equipment operates with no visible errors and tolerances specifications nodes.
Please, see attachment screen shot (left to right) for illustration on this phenomenon: screen 1 - Process Hacker display CPU time using in %% and history on latest 60 sec, screen 2 - HWiNFO64 before restart this phenomenon is exists, screen 3 - HWiNFO64 after restart this phenomenon is exists.
Hardware config is:
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 (Wolfdale-H, E0)
3166 MHz (9.50x333.3) @ 1997 MHz (6.00x333.0)
Motherboard: ASUS P5Q SE
Chipset: Intel P45 (Eaglelake-P) + ICH10 Consumer
Memory: 4096 MBytes @ 399 MHz, 6.0-6-6-18
- 2048 MB PC6400 DDR2-SDRAM - Samsung M378T2863RZS-CF7
- 2048 MB PC6400 DDR2-SDRAM - Nanya Technology M2Y2G64TU8HG5B-AC
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti, 1024 MB GDDR5 SDRAM
Drive: WDC WD1002FBYS-02A6B0, 976.8 GB, Serial ATA 3Gb/s
Drive: ST3160023AS, 156.3 GB, Serial ATA 1.5Gb/s
Drive: ST3160811AS, 156.3 GB, Serial ATA 1.5Gb/s
Drive: PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-112, DVD+R DL
Drive: PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-112, DVD+R DL
Sound: Intel ICH10 - High Definition Audio Controller [A0]
Sound: NVIDIA GF116 - High Definition Audio Controller
Network: Qualcomm/Atheros AR8121/AR8113/AR8114 PCI-E Ethernet Controller (L1e)
P.S.
The phenomenon is clearly not so common that we can make a similar hypothesis about its nature and, therefore, of interest to me. But since I can not afford to respond to what we have to do is put this topic off-topic to when we define the character of its nature to take the right decision where to move? I will try to replace the allegedly incompatible equipment, but the question is will selecting his replacement or the market has no analogues thereof (at least within "drive, choose and buy")?
Please, see attachment screen shot (left to right) for illustration on this phenomenon: screen 1 - Process Hacker display CPU time using in %% and history on latest 60 sec, screen 2 - HWiNFO64 before restart this phenomenon is exists, screen 3 - HWiNFO64 after restart this phenomenon is exists.
Hardware config is:
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 (Wolfdale-H, E0)
3166 MHz (9.50x333.3) @ 1997 MHz (6.00x333.0)
Motherboard: ASUS P5Q SE
Chipset: Intel P45 (Eaglelake-P) + ICH10 Consumer
Memory: 4096 MBytes @ 399 MHz, 6.0-6-6-18
- 2048 MB PC6400 DDR2-SDRAM - Samsung M378T2863RZS-CF7
- 2048 MB PC6400 DDR2-SDRAM - Nanya Technology M2Y2G64TU8HG5B-AC
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti, 1024 MB GDDR5 SDRAM
Drive: WDC WD1002FBYS-02A6B0, 976.8 GB, Serial ATA 3Gb/s
Drive: ST3160023AS, 156.3 GB, Serial ATA 1.5Gb/s
Drive: ST3160811AS, 156.3 GB, Serial ATA 1.5Gb/s
Drive: PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-112, DVD+R DL
Drive: PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-112, DVD+R DL
Sound: Intel ICH10 - High Definition Audio Controller [A0]
Sound: NVIDIA GF116 - High Definition Audio Controller
Network: Qualcomm/Atheros AR8121/AR8113/AR8114 PCI-E Ethernet Controller (L1e)
P.S.
The phenomenon is clearly not so common that we can make a similar hypothesis about its nature and, therefore, of interest to me. But since I can not afford to respond to what we have to do is put this topic off-topic to when we define the character of its nature to take the right decision where to move? I will try to replace the allegedly incompatible equipment, but the question is will selecting his replacement or the market has no analogues thereof (at least within "drive, choose and buy")?