Thank you so much for an awesome program. It is so much better, more comprehensive, & more accurate than any of the alternatives.
I have a Threadripper 3960x on a Gigabyte TRX40 Aorus Master. I have a few questions about some of the sensors/readings:
SENSORS
* ITE IT8688E: is this the main super I/O?
* ITE IT8792E: is this a secondary super I/O?
* Infineon XDPE132GSC: is this the main VRM?
* IRF IR35204: is this the SoC VRM?
READINGS
* Why doesn't the average of the Core 0-23 VIDs equal the Core VID (Effective)? I understand that the VID values are the requested voltages, and that SVI2 is the best indicator of actual voltage. But I'm just curious why the average of the core VIDs for the individual cores doesn't equal the CPU Core VID.
* The XDPE132GSC reports two different VR Out values. One is almost exactly equal to SVI2 but one is consistently near zero. I assume the latter is just some extraneous field reported by the sensor?
* For XDPE132GSC, as expected per laws of electricity, power in = current in * volt in and power out = current out * volt out. But for IR35204, the relationship is correct for power in, but for power out is only about 95% of current out * volt out. I'm just curious why. (Note: this is not the same as power inefficiency, whereby power out is ~90% of power in, as expected due to inefficiency in the form of heat. This is just comparing power out to voltage out and current out.)
* CPU: Core + SoC Power is consistently 22-33W less than CPU Package Power -- does that mean there are other things beyond Core & SoC that are not directly displayed but included in Package Power?
I have a Threadripper 3960x on a Gigabyte TRX40 Aorus Master. I have a few questions about some of the sensors/readings:
SENSORS
* ITE IT8688E: is this the main super I/O?
* ITE IT8792E: is this a secondary super I/O?
* Infineon XDPE132GSC: is this the main VRM?
* IRF IR35204: is this the SoC VRM?
READINGS
* Why doesn't the average of the Core 0-23 VIDs equal the Core VID (Effective)? I understand that the VID values are the requested voltages, and that SVI2 is the best indicator of actual voltage. But I'm just curious why the average of the core VIDs for the individual cores doesn't equal the CPU Core VID.
* The XDPE132GSC reports two different VR Out values. One is almost exactly equal to SVI2 but one is consistently near zero. I assume the latter is just some extraneous field reported by the sensor?
* For XDPE132GSC, as expected per laws of electricity, power in = current in * volt in and power out = current out * volt out. But for IR35204, the relationship is correct for power in, but for power out is only about 95% of current out * volt out. I'm just curious why. (Note: this is not the same as power inefficiency, whereby power out is ~90% of power in, as expected due to inefficiency in the form of heat. This is just comparing power out to voltage out and current out.)
* CPU: Core + SoC Power is consistently 22-33W less than CPU Package Power -- does that mean there are other things beyond Core & SoC that are not directly displayed but included in Package Power?