Search results

I realize they are read from the SMU but I was wondering why they aren't multiplied by the BCLK after being read. This would make it accurate even if the SMU readout is incorrect. Although you're much more knowledgeable of how these things work, this was just how I thought it would work...

Thank you for your response Martin! Is there a way around this? Before I overclocked the BCLK I was able to use the L3 Clock to determine if I was clock stretching under single-core loads because the L3 actually showed the effective clock (I think) but now I have no idea if I'm clock stretching...

I recently overclocked my 5700X to run at 102 BCLK but the only readings that show the change in HWiNFO are Bus Clock (102) and Core Clock (4,947 max). None of the other readings seem to reflect the change. Core Ratio (max) = 48.5 (should be 49.4 or 49.5 rounded up) FCLK = 1,767 (should be...

Great. It seems like you've got it all worked out and working well now.

Well I guess that answers that. I suppose that also explains why it's measuring improperly in GPU-Z as well.

Hello, I've been trying to dial in the power consumption on a low(ish) power emulation/htpc build I've been setting up. When at idle HWinfo as well as GPU-Z both show GPU power consumption at 32W. This number seems ridiculously high for a 1650. Other users and review sites show idle power...

It's possible that HWinfo is reporting too frequently which results in your processor not being able to idle properly. I've seen this as a common issue. After reinstalling HWinfo you can run Command Prompt (as administrator) and type in the following command line: powercfg /energy /duration 5...