Hi,
I have been using HWINFO32 on and off for a few years and versions, mostly on the same machine - it's a (now OLD ) Asus EEEPC 901 netbook (Intel Atom N270), with no HDs and a couple of smallish - and slow - SSD drives.
The reason for the 'and off' part is because of some random freezes which in the past I've never bothered to really investigate... :dodgy: but this time around I might wish to become just a *little* more involved with the issue.
The symptom is: upon returning from stand-by (but not EVERY time) HWINFO32 will be eating up 50% of the processor (both sides of the hyperthreading). Will resist all attempts to kill process. Will survive a logoff, so I have to reboot the machine.
I was just looking at the bug report here: http://www.hwinfo.com/forum/Thread-...elf-up-unable-to-close-and-100-one-core-usage . There are some similarities, but the OP says the issue was solved with 411.1827 (64-bit), while I'm using 411.1844 (32-bit).
You've asked in that other post about any other monitoring tool being used in parallel. I DO use Crystal DiskInfo tool for monitoring USB hard drives.
Maybe you can convince this lazy fella here to open a REAL bug report in the proper manner... while I'm wondering how it could be done since the issue happens in a seemingly random fashion.
Cheers
I have been using HWINFO32 on and off for a few years and versions, mostly on the same machine - it's a (now OLD ) Asus EEEPC 901 netbook (Intel Atom N270), with no HDs and a couple of smallish - and slow - SSD drives.
The reason for the 'and off' part is because of some random freezes which in the past I've never bothered to really investigate... :dodgy: but this time around I might wish to become just a *little* more involved with the issue.
The symptom is: upon returning from stand-by (but not EVERY time) HWINFO32 will be eating up 50% of the processor (both sides of the hyperthreading). Will resist all attempts to kill process. Will survive a logoff, so I have to reboot the machine.
I was just looking at the bug report here: http://www.hwinfo.com/forum/Thread-...elf-up-unable-to-close-and-100-one-core-usage . There are some similarities, but the OP says the issue was solved with 411.1827 (64-bit), while I'm using 411.1844 (32-bit).
You've asked in that other post about any other monitoring tool being used in parallel. I DO use Crystal DiskInfo tool for monitoring USB hard drives.
Maybe you can convince this lazy fella here to open a REAL bug report in the proper manner... while I'm wondering how it could be done since the issue happens in a seemingly random fashion.
Cheers