Recent content by Mainframer

The drivers are mostly the same.... GPU driver is the same every time. Chipset/ME is the same as well. LAN is from Windows, but could be killer instead of Intel... audio is Realtek-based (i don't install anything else). The difference between boards isn't much at all on that front (though...

I'll give that a try too. :) Though I had SMART polling at 1000 already... any suggestions on that polling period?

I guess the curious part is that I could leave the polling rate alone before and now (I'd say around Z690 time and w/e version came out around then) feels like the software is more 'sensitive' to external factors. I could literally drop in several boards and not have to touch the polling rate...

Thanks again! I understand what you are saying. I just wanted the time recorded in the log to match my intervals consistently and, from what you are saying, it can't really. My system load remains the same (AIDA64 stress test) as does the OS for all of these boards I test. Literally, the only...

BUMP! :)

Thank you for the response!! :) In this case, it looks like the motherboard sensor (Asus) is taking the longest(400+ms). It's mostly 0's outside of the RAM (16/17ms) and videocard (20-23ms) though...the thing is... I need that sensor from the motherboard in most cases as I'm measuring something...

Good day, all! I use this software to record data during testing. For this test/purpose, I use Hwinfo (7.20.xx) with AIDA64 Engineer and run the stress test (CPU/FPU/Cache are checked) concurrently. Lately, I've been having issues with the polling rate not matching the log/dataset count...