Hi Martin, I noticed the new network activity attributes in HWiNFO64, very nice as usual.
Just FYI, one board I use has dual NICs which I have teamed in an adaptive load balancing configuration. The HWiNFO64 display of the teamed NICs works fine, an example:
[attachment=871]
One thing I noticed, the "Current DL Rate" and "Current UP Rate" fields for the NIC that is first in the display (Intel I217) were grouped under the Intel I211AT heading. In other words, I had two "Current DL Rate" and "Current UP Rate" fields under the I211 heading, and none under the I217 heading.
I moved those two fields up under the Intel I217 heading. But I remembered that the I211AT NIC is configured as the primary adapter, the I217 as secondary adapter.
I'm wondering if you purposefully put the I217's "Current DL Rate" and "Current UP Rate" fields under the primary adapter? Just curious.
Do you know if the value in the Maximum column for "Total DL" for the primary I211 adapter is just for it, or the total for the team? Thanks.
Just FYI, one board I use has dual NICs which I have teamed in an adaptive load balancing configuration. The HWiNFO64 display of the teamed NICs works fine, an example:
[attachment=871]
One thing I noticed, the "Current DL Rate" and "Current UP Rate" fields for the NIC that is first in the display (Intel I217) were grouped under the Intel I211AT heading. In other words, I had two "Current DL Rate" and "Current UP Rate" fields under the I211 heading, and none under the I217 heading.
I moved those two fields up under the Intel I217 heading. But I remembered that the I211AT NIC is configured as the primary adapter, the I217 as secondary adapter.
I'm wondering if you purposefully put the I217's "Current DL Rate" and "Current UP Rate" fields under the primary adapter? Just curious.
Do you know if the value in the Maximum column for "Total DL" for the primary I211 adapter is just for it, or the total for the team? Thanks.