New fan monitor Clevo P870DM + P870KM change place in sensor panel order after reboot

papusan

Member
Hello Martin. First I will thank you for this amazing tool. 


I use the Portable version of Hwinfo64. Have always used portable versions of all software if they are available in this format.

I have tested out the added monitoring of fan speeds on Clevo P870DM and P870KM series. You added in this feature in HWiNFO v6.01-3630 Beta.



The added fan monitoring for my Clevo P870DM works very good. But I have now installed latest Beta version  HWiNFO v6.01-3660 from your download link. Something have changed from your first Beta version with this *new fan monitoring feature*. I have always put up Hwinfo sensor panel in an order I prefer. Aka I added in the fan monitoring where I wanted it to be in sensor panel.

The problem... When I restart/clean boot and open up Hwinfo sensor panel, the fan monitoring sensors will be showed in the bottom of Hwinfo sensor panel... And not where I put it. I then start reorder and put the fan monitoring where I want it in sensor panel and can see it stay there when I force fans on max. If I reboot with max fans the fans monitoring stay exactly where I put it.

The problem with change of fan monitoring placement in sensor panel row will only happen if I boot up my machine without max fans on (on Clevo I can start fans with Fn+1 while laptop boot up). And will stay like this forever. This never happened with the first Beta HWiNFO v6.01-3630 Beta


I hope you understand what I meant (fan monitoring in latest beta version will be put in bottom of sensor panel when I start without maxed fans). Could you look on this? because something is changed from first working beta.


The way I put fan monitoring in first working beta. This versjon works as intended.
[attachment=3239]

Best regards
papusan
 

Attachments

papusan

Member
Martin said:
I think I know what this problem is and it has indeed been introduced in the latest Beta build.
It's similar to this one: https://www.hwinfo.com/forum/Thread-bug-HwInfo-doesnt-store-OSD-settings-anymore-properly
and thus shall be fixed in the next build/version.
Thank you sir. I have now downloaded and installed Hwinfo version 6.02 and the fans stay where I want it in the sensor panel. Thanks.

I'm sorry I forgot to tell you about a second bug (I was very hanged up in the fan placement bugs and forgot it). I can put it here now. No need to put up a new Bug post for this. This is up to you.

One of the sensors can't be disabled. You can see what sensor I talk about in the picture. I mean it worked as it should in the Beta version HWiNFO v6.01-3630 Beta whitch haven't the fan placement bug. The sensor flaw (bug) popped up in later beta against with the fans placement bug and have now follow after/over in new released Hwinfo v6.02

[attachment=3245]


Thank you very much Martin for the fix, your amazing work and software. 


Best regards
Papusan
 

Attachments

Martin

HWiNFO Author
Staff member
Thanks for the feedback.
Can you please try to reset settings in HWiNFO and then check if this problem with disabling sensor persists?
 

papusan

Member
Martin said:
Thanks for the feedback.
Can you please try to reset settings in HWiNFO and then check if this problem with disabling sensor persists?
Hello Martin. I reset settings in HWiNFO for testing. And yeah the sensor could now be disabled. I then added in my personal settings afterwards and yees.... It could still be disabled. Aka work now as intended :) Probably something was stuck.

May I ask a question when we now close the case. How correct is the  VR VCC Temperature (SVID) temp reading? It may depend on the quality of the components used on the motherboard. I see this sensor more as a good pointing stick how the temp is.. 

Thanks for the help.

[attachment=3246]

Best regards
Papusan
 

Attachments

Martin

HWiNFO Author
Staff member
Accuracy of the VR VCC Temperature (SVID) value depends only on quality of the internal temperature sensor in the VRM.
So I think it should be quite accurate.
 

papusan

Member
Martin said:
Accuracy of the VR VCC Temperature (SVID) value depends only on quality of the internal temperature sensor in the VRM.
So I think it should be quite accurate.
Thank you. And I have now send you an gift right now. Hope you find it in your account :)


Thanks again.

Best regards
Papusan
 
Top