IronSky
Member
on my end,
since I began using 1693, the numbers have never never moved from 40 - 42 C.
re: the previous post - I was reminded that ET6 was also reporting 100 C back when I was using it ( which I am not now )
as far as I am concerned, I am sticking with 1693
at this stage, I am happy ;-)
since I began using 1693, the numbers have never never moved from 40 - 42 C.
re: the previous post - I was reminded that ET6 was also reporting 100 C back when I was using it ( which I am not now )
as far as I am concerned, I am sticking with 1693
at this stage, I am happy ;-)