VictorVG
Well-Known Member
Automatic shutdown of unused sensors can be realized by a simple algorithm - we compare the current and several previous values for the sensor, and if they do not change, and the values that they display are striving for the minimum or maximum boundaries of the scale, then this sensor is not connected and it can be turned off, and if you need a user He will turn it on.
And then the same AIDA64 loves to display nonsense. For example, on my system boards physically there are no sensors “-12V” and “+5V” - these inputs of the Nuvoton NCT6779D chip through a 10k resistor are connected to a general wire (GND) scheme, but all versions of AIDA64 over the past few years, including the latest V7.60.7300 In the "Voltage" section, it is continue at different's system, displayed (user can't it turned off) "sensors"
"+5 V 5.725 V" and "-12 V -14.914 V", and up to difference's machine like's sensor - "+5 V 5.699 V" and "-12 V -14.914 V", somewhat wrote to the authors AIDA64 bug-reports, but this is apparently not interested in it they do not answer and do not correct - "More bugs, good and different!" In this regard, they look like the authors of CPU-Z - they publicly indicated to them in their analysis of SPD in 2007 - 2008 (?) yy, but "Why fix it? And so it will go!".
And then the same AIDA64 loves to display nonsense. For example, on my system boards physically there are no sensors “-12V” and “+5V” - these inputs of the Nuvoton NCT6779D chip through a 10k resistor are connected to a general wire (GND) scheme, but all versions of AIDA64 over the past few years, including the latest V7.60.7300 In the "Voltage" section, it is continue at different's system, displayed (user can't it turned off) "sensors"
"+5 V 5.725 V" and "-12 V -14.914 V", and up to difference's machine like's sensor - "+5 V 5.699 V" and "-12 V -14.914 V", somewhat wrote to the authors AIDA64 bug-reports, but this is apparently not interested in it they do not answer and do not correct - "More bugs, good and different!" In this regard, they look like the authors of CPU-Z - they publicly indicated to them in their analysis of SPD in 2007 - 2008 (?) yy, but "Why fix it? And so it will go!".