Weird comparison HWiNFO32 and CPUID Hardware Monitor sensors

Re: Weird comparison HWiNFO32 and CPUID Hardware Monitor sen

Well I stupidly forgot to configure it to make a log. Have done that now.

I've never been able to stress it enough to make the fan speed up - my games are all just casual 2-D. What makes fan speedup is room heat coming on in the morning. I'll try turning thermostat up.
 
Re: Weird comparison HWiNFO32 and CPUID Hardware Monitor sen

Curious thing. Raised room temperature to 92 F. Your program faithfully tracked the max up to 1735.
[CPUID shows max 96428 (bogus?) and 1313. I'm entering problem report at CPUID.]
 

Attachments

  • ScreenShot016.gif
    ScreenShot016.gif
    2.8 KB · Views: 634
Re: Weird comparison HWiNFO32 and CPUID Hardware Monitor sen

Thanks for the feedback. So the Min/Max values reported are ok?
cnmoore said:
Curious thing. Raised room temperature to 92 F. Your program faithfully tracked the max up to 1735.
[CPUID shows max 96428 (bogus?) and 1313. I'm entering problem report at CPUID.]
 
Re: Weird comparison HWiNFO32 and CPUID Hardware Monitor sen

Yes, the Min fan values have always agreed with CPUID's.

Do you feel 1735 and 1054 are reasonable max fan speeds, considering how hot the NB got? I myself would have expected higher.

But this is certainly a remarkable PC, completely silent even when maxed out on graphics, no fan or disk sound whatever, and runs around 25 C cooler than my old 2003 PC.
 

Attachments

  • ScreenShot018.gif
    ScreenShot018.gif
    26 KB · Views: 633
Back
Top